Created by Yoav Duman · Free comparative politics simulations
Reply Across
Advise Canada in 1992 and India in 1956 before hindsight. Preserve a prediction, respond to objections and revisit the advice beside the historical record. An optional Spain postscript extends the comparison.
Possible States edition. Play is free and needs no account. Responses and backups stay on the student’s device. Use the report/export controls to create a readable record, then submit it through your course system. This edition does not use online drafts, class codes, instructor login or automatic submission. Any older hosted-workflow directions in a linked original download do not apply. Open the simulation · Activity overview
Learning goals
Compare federal arrangements and competing national claims.
Recognize internal minorities and the categories used to count people.
Evaluate earlier advice using later evidence without erasing the original reasoning.
Preparation and pacing
Approximately 45–60 minutes, plus an optional ten-minute postscript. This is a planning estimate.
Play the activity once before assigning it. Specify the required route or stopping point in your course system, introduce only the concepts students need at entry, and reserve time to debrief a decision and its consequences.
Share the direct activity link and identify the required endpoint.
Ask students to preserve an initial prediction and explain one consequential choice using a specific case detail.
Compare mechanisms and tradeoffs in the debrief. Ask for a rival account, an implication and a limit.
Have students check their exported report and upload it themselves. A completed sequence records tasks; it does not automatically grade the quality of their reasoning.
Student saving and submission
Browser saving belongs to this device and website address. Clearing browsing data, private browsing or changing devices can remove access to it. A downloaded progress backup is for resuming the game. A PDF, text or HTML response report is for reading and assessment. Students may repeat and revise; any history included in the activity’s report should be reviewed in context.
Use fictional roles and permit students to analyze a position without disclosing their own political beliefs. Grade evidence, mechanisms, comparisons and limits.