Civil resistance

Self-contained introduction

Civil resistance, institutional dependencies & repression

The Repression Trap

The streets are full. Why is the president still in power?

Lead a movement through five decisions about rallies, workplace refusals, repression and political offers. Track whose cooperation changes, sustain participants, and test the same move under a different outside-backing package. A promise, a leader’s departure and democracy are different outcomes.

How it runsSolo simulation
Time to plan45–65 active min · planning estimate
What you produceField report with forecasts, first explanations, revisions, a changed-setting comparison and a transfer argument

The same political choices in both routes. You can switch inside without starting over. For class asks you to complete any missing required responses. Save a report in either route; your instructor decides what to accept.

For class: download your report when you finish, then submit it through your course website. Downloading does not submit it.

Choose Save + pause to keep a checkpoint in this browser. Autosave is optional. Download a progress JSON before changing devices or websites; a readable report does not restore progress.

Saving & submission →
Embed this activity

Bring the activity into your course.

Paste this snippet into an LMS or website HTML editor that supports iframes. The activity stays hosted by Possible States; its source code is not included.

Keep the full-tab link included below the frame. Some LMSs and browsers restrict embedded storage, downloads or printing. Students should download a backup before changing views; opening a new tab does not transfer an in-memory record.

Embedding and free-use permissions →
The Repression Trap. Created by Yoav Duman. A fictional harbor city, workers and a crowd connected to government institutions by red threads.
Civil resistance

What you can explore

  • Distinguish public attention, movement endurance and enacted institutional noncooperation.
  • Trace an actor, a dependency and a behavioral change while accounting for unequal costs.
  • Explain contingent responses to repression and the scope of a one-episode support-package comparison.
  • Separate promises, verified gains, leadership turnover, a negotiating opening and democracy.

YOUR CAMPAIGN FIELD KIT

Keep the reasoning.

Play online or download the self-contained game and teaching materials. Your first explanations and later revisions stay distinct.

Browser saves are separate on each website. Use a progress JSON to transfer your work. Exporting a report does not submit it.

What the model leaves open

Lydora, its events, people, indices and numerical relationships are invented. The replay switches a support package, not treasury finance alone. Reach combines attention and relationships. This short domestic scenario is not a model of occupation. Timing and learning effects require classroom piloting.

AFTERWARD, THINK ABOUT

Which institution changed what it did, and whose cooperation mattered?

Teaching this activity Debrief, assessment & assignment draft

Bring it back to the room

  • Which institution changed what it did, and whose cooperation mattered?
  • When did greater attention leave pressure unchanged, or a useful response coexist with a net loss?
  • What did the changed-setting replay hold fixed, and which components remain inseparable?
  • What was implemented or remains unconfirmed, and what would test a rival explanation?

What to assess

Assess the actor-dependency mechanism, specific evidence and its status, costs, a plausible rival with discriminating evidence, thoughtful revision and transfer. The writing-first report retains all original evidence and revisions. A favorable political ending and completion word floors are not learning grades.

Read the complete teaching guide →

Syllabus description, rubric & printable companion →

Prepare an assignment to share.

Edit this text, then copy it into Canvas or your course website. These edits stay in this tab.

Syllabus description & discussion prompts

Syllabus description

Lead a movement through five decisions about rallies, workplace refusals, repression and political offers. Track whose cooperation changes, sustain participants, and test the same move under a different outside-backing package. A promise, a leader’s departure and democracy are different outcomes. Students produce field report with forecasts, first explanations, revisions, a changed-setting comparison and a transfer argument.

Questions for a discussion board or class debrief

  1. Which institution changed what it did, and whose cooperation mattered?
  2. When did greater attention leave pressure unchanged, or a useful response coexist with a net loss?
  3. What did the changed-setting replay hold fixed, and which components remain inseparable?
  4. What was implemented or remains unconfirmed, and what would test a rival explanation?
Open printable teaching companion →